Re-Thinking David Stockman

Mr. Stockman was interviewed this morning on the John Gambling radio show (WOR, 710 on your AM dial, or listen on your i-Phone) and he sounded almost… reasonable. Perhaps I was the victim, yet again, of New York Times “selective editing”?

At least, I think I’m the victim of sneaky Times editing; it’s possible Stockman himself constructed this excerpt from his newly released book, but I suspect a Times editor cherry-picked the book for anti-GOP material.

On the other hand, that Times piece also links to a different “Great Deformation” excerpt, something Stockman calls his “Economic Heroes/Villians” list, where we find he’s put Bill Clinton on the &%#@ing “heroes” side of the ledger (Roosevelt and Obama are on the “villians” side)!

You remember Clinton, he was the US president who went so far to the left that, two years into his first term, Americans voted both houses of congress Republican for the first time in 40 years. Those Republicans held the President’s feet to the fire and the result was several years of balanced US budgets, for the first time in 30 years.

But Clinton also orchestrated the ramping up of the Community Reinvestment Act, which forced banks to abandon all lending criteria for borrowers, which eventually led to a 7 trillion-dollar melt-down of the housing market. He’s no hero. Stockman thinks he is. That makes me question everything else Stockman believes.

Ol' Dave Stockman: In reality, it appears that his book slams both political parties equally.

Ol’ Dave Stockman: In reality, it appears that his book slams both political parties equally

1 thought on “Re-Thinking David Stockman

  1. CRA in and of itself did not lead to meltdown of housing market, and it was around long before Clinton (although it got juiced up quite a bit during his era). Lot of ways attempted to skin the CRA cat and banks tried hard to repackage it in order to get reg cap relief. Not a lot of ’em were successful, so it sat on bank balance sheet. That’s an important point, because when you own the risk you tend to be more mindful of the house money vs. pawning it off. Multifamily was often used to get there in terms of CRA eligibility, and some banks actually bought pools of securities that contained CRA multifamily loans, which got them the benefit required under gov’t regs without actually having to make the loans–which nobody really wanted to do. So, the trade was buy CRA-eligible CMBS/RMBS and donate money to Al Sharpton, a.k.a. the socially enlightened extortionist.

Comment (anonymously, if you wish) On This Post....

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s